Physical model vs ML-only power prediction
The selected data-driven profile is compared directly with the physical reference.
The ML model remains data-driven; the physical reference starts from the usage-derived estimated temperature.
Learning heating-cycle patterns from historical power data
The selected data-driven profile is compared directly with the physical reference.
The ML model remains data-driven; the physical reference starts from the usage-derived estimated temperature.
Prediction may look precise but may not be meaningful.
Historical cycles explain what the ML model learned from measured data.
Both models are data-driven. They can only learn from situations represented in the training data.
| Method | MAE [W] | ON/OFF accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | - | - |
| Random Forest | - | - |
Metrics are calculated on the newest 20% of representative cycles, split by cycle start time.
Elnett EUN 5 reference: 5 L, 2 kW, measured 18 °C inlet and 59 °C maximum hot-water temperature.
The reference is integrated with a one-second step using energy balance, heat loss, and thermostat hysteresis. Continuous outlet flow during reheating is zero by default; prior hot-water draw-off is represented by the calculated lower start temperature.